Total Pageviews

Blog Archive

Search This Blog

Featured

Featured (7)

Branches

Victor Roosensplein 7
2170 Merksem
Gsm: +32 488 10 59 38
Fax: +32 2 212 19 03
antwerpen@fedactio.be
Martelarenlaan 46
3500 Hasselt
+32 11 43 64 05
Fax: +32 11 43 65 40
limburg@fedactio.be
Kartuizerlaan 107
9000 Gent
+32 483 65 18 59
gent@fedactio.be
Rue jumet 175,
6030 Marchienne au Pont
Tel: +32 71 13 80 30
GSM : +32 472 854368
hainaut@fedactio.be
Rue de Fexhe 26,
4000 Liège
Tel: +32 4 233 54 52
liege@fedactio.be

Banner

Banner
Showing posts with label Gender. Show all posts

Fedactio's commitment as part of International Women's Day

As part of International Women's Day celebrated on March 8, Fedactio would like to reiterate its commitment to the defence of women's rights and gender equality. Although mentalities evolve in some contexts, such as in politics where women now manage to find their way, gender inequalities are still deeply rooted in our society.

The International Women's Day is an opportunity to mark the occasion and continue the fight for a gender-equal society. In this context, events will be organised throughout Belgium from March 6 to 15. In Brussels, a very rich and varied programme of events has been established, ranging from self-defence lessons to film debates, as well as round tables on various topics such as the objectification of women in the Maghreb, the place of women in the media or gynaecological abuse. These events are the perfect occasion to learn about the place of women in our society and to take stock of the situation. Between the objectives already achieved and the many advances that still need to be accomplished, the road to gender equality remains long and full of obstacles. Fortunately, many field actors including associations, non-profit organizations, feminist movements, collectives and many others have taken up this issue and made it their daily battle. 

In recent weeks, Fedactio has also tried to contribute to the promotion of women, particularly through its campaign intended to put women in the spotlight. In this way, we have portrayed women from all backgrounds, active in many and varied fields such as STEM, politics, education and biology. In the field of science, we had the opportunity to talk to Angélique Léonard, Laurence Broze, Stella Diamant, Elise Marsicano, Sophie Lucas and Nisreen El-Hashemite, all women with brilliant and inspiring careers. In politics, Fedactio also highlighted the activities of inspiring women such as Els Van Hoof for her fight against female genital mutilation, Anuna De Wever for her commitment against global warming and Michelle Obama for her involvement in the issue of girls' education. All these women, however different they may be, represent models of success for future generations and are living proof that women are just as capable as men of achieving brilliant careers and ambitious projects. 

Through all these meetings that have enriched our "Women and Society" platform, Fedactio has tried to highlight the under-representation of women in order to raise public awareness of the related issues. In a society made by men, for men, it is imperative to put in place concrete actions aimed at promoting greater feminisation to reach a society that is equal and therefore more representative of the individuals who compose it. Although this struggle is far from over and Fedactio will continue to make its contribution, the final word goes to the United Nations, whose leitmotif for the International Women’s Day will be: "Think equal, build smart, innovate for change". 

[Woman in the spotlight] Angélique Léonard: empowerment of women in science

This week, Fedactio honours Angélique Léonard, Professor of Chemical Engineering at the Faculty of Applied Sciences of the University of Liège and chair of the "Femmes & Sciences" Committee of the Wallonia-Brussels Federation. In the context of the International Day of Women and Girls in Science, we spoke with Ms Léonard about her work to promote gender equality and empower girls and women in applied science.

Could you start by introducing yourself in a few words and describing your professional background?

My name is Angélique Léonard. I trained as a civil engineer in chemistry and materials science at the University of Liège. After my engineering studies, I completed a doctoral thesis followed by a postdoctoral stay abroad in Bordeaux and London. Then, I obtained a standing mandate as a qualified researcher at the FNRS and in 2009, I became a lecturer on a theme related to sustainable development in industrial processes. Since then, I have risen through the various ranks of the academic career, becoming professor and finally full professor. Since 2016, I have been a member of the “Femmes & Sciences” Committee and in May 2018, I have been chosen to be the chair of the committee.

Speaking of the “Femmes & Sciences” Committee, could you explain what it is and what its functions and activities are?

This committee had been existing in an unofficial way for about between 15 and 20 years before being officially established by a decree in 2016. The main objective of the committee is to promote equal careers for women and men, especially in the scientific and academic fields. To do this, we had to undertake various actions. Firstly, we had to highlight the figures, which means we had to obtain gender statistics on the different fields of study and careers. Secondly, we also had to define a set of good practices to be disseminated within universities and see how we can help to improve the reconciliation of private and professional life in order to encourage the presence of women in the highest positions of this type of career.

How do you explain such an under-representation of women in STEM studies and careers?

As we have seen during this day, this is an extremely complex issue since we have seen that, in the end, women are just as competent as men. Indeed, when conditions are favourable, [Editor’s note. literally “stereotypes’ falsification”] their performance is similar to that of men. However, we can see that we have been immersed in a gendered representation of trades since we were very young, and we clearly see that because of this context, girls are moving more naturally towards trades in the fields of social work, personal assistance, childhood, health (medical, paramedical) or education and it is no accident. In fact, we can clearly see that women have put in place strategies to reconcile professional and private life and in most cases, these professions allow the necessary flexibility to reconcile these two aspects. On the other hand, we also note that boys project themselves more in the technical field, in production and in professions where the notions of competitiveness and performance are predominant. We must admit that these are not skills or profiles that are generally associated with girls. Once again, this amalgam is the result of stereotypes and it is precisely these stereotypes that must be questioned and challenged.

In your opinion, which are the main obstacles to the integration of women in STEM fields?

I do not think there are any real obstacles to integration. This is primarily because they do not choose STEM. However, when we talk about integration at different career levels, if we consider a career in STEM at the industrial level, we realize that the obstacles encountered are generally related to the reconciliation of private and professional life. For example, in my promotion as a civil engineer in chemistry, we were five girls. Only one of us tried the industry experience but she had a mental breakdown after about 5 years because of the extremely high pressure she experienced in her job. Maybe she was putting too much pressure on herself. A little later, she reoriented herself towards teaching, as did my other classmates and myself. When I made the choice to stay in university, while not knowing if I would have the opportunity to pursue a career there, I also took into account the reconciliation of my private life and my professional life. This reconciliation represents a real obstacle, given that, as we have seen during this day, the education of children remains a women responsibility for the most part, although this is changing.

In your opinion, what are the political actions to implement in order to promote the integration of women in these sectors?

We actually realize that today, we have all the cards to make things move in the right direction. We can thus cite the Pact for an Excellent Education implemented by the Wallonia-Brussels Federation, which contains various points aimed at introducing all these technological concepts at the core curriculum. Its objective is to ensure that girls and boys have access to the same types of curricula and learn the same subjects so that there is no difference at this level. The fact that teachers, who will interact with children, have the opportunity to receive continuous training within companies and in skills training centres, makes it possible for them to be able to adapt their teaching methods and ensure that their courses are always in line with the rapidly changing society. We can also mention the initial training of teachers since the decree was passed last week in Parliament. Everything has to be built. The teaching toolkits provide for the gender notion to be integrated in a transversal way in the training of future teachers, but it must also be operationalized in the right way so that they can deconstruct stereotypes and have this gendered approach in their curricula and in the lessons they will teach children later on.

If you had a message for girls and young women who are reluctant to pursue STEM studies or careers, what would it be?

I would say to these young women they have to dare. They are as competent as men and if they dare to pursue STEM studies, there are plenty of great careers waiting for them, so do not be afraid and make the choice of STEM if it is what you want to!


Angélique Léonard holds a master's degree in chemical engineering and a doctorate in applied sciences. Aware of environmental issues a long time ago, she sensed from her studies that the treatment of sewage sludge would be a major challenge. Author of a final thesis on an industrial unit for drying sludge from wastewater treatment plants, she continued her subject with her doctoral thesis (2003). She is the first researcher in the world to have used X-ray microtomography imaging technology to study the drying of deformable materials, including sewage sludge, but also synthetic gels and agri-food products. 
Since 2007, she has been a qualified FNRS researcher. Today, she is a full professor at the Faculty of Applied Sciences of the University of Liège, where she has headed the chemical engineering research unit since 2016. She has received several awards, including the Frédéric Swarts Award delivered by the Royal Academy of Science, Letters and Fine Arts of Belgium awarded to original scientific research in the chemical industry. She has co-authored more than 120 articles in international journals and more than 120 conference proceedings.
In May 2018, Mrs Léonard was chosen to be the chair of the “Femmes & Sciences” Committee created in 2016 by the Wallonia-Brussels Federation. The committee supports the empowerment of women in academic and scientific institutions. The council provides advice and recommendations on gender equality and discusses actions to be taken in this regard.
Mrs Léonard's work is perfectly in line with the actions implemented by Fedactio to give women a voice. We salute her career and all she has done for women in science. Finally, Fedactio supports the mission of the committee she represents to promote gender equality in applied sciences.

Place of women in STEM: inspiring measures and combating stereotypes

Within the framework of the International Day of Women and Girls in Science and in line with its campaign of putting women in the spotlight, Fedactio is considering the under-representation of women in STEM and highlights inspiring measures to remedy this situation.



In this context, Fedactio took part to the meeting “Regards croisés sur les carrières au féminin dans les STIM” organized by the “Femmes & Sciences” committee held on February 11 in Brussels. Angélique Léonard, Chair of the committee and Professor at the University of Liège introduced the topic before giving the floor to various stakeholders among which:
· Marie-Martine Schyns, Minister of Education in the Federation Wallonia-Brussels;
· Dominique Lafontaine, Professor of Educational Sciences at the University of Liège;
· Roberta Pattono, Member of the European Commission’s Directorate General of the Research and Innovation Department;
· Isabelle Régner, Professor and researcher at the Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology at the University of Aix-Marseille;
· Christel Opdebeeck, Policy Officer at the Flemish Ministry of Education;
as well as various representatives of field associations (Hypatia, Interface3, Elles bougent, etc.).

This meeting made it possible to raise the issue of the under-representation of women in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). In fact, today, the percentage of women in sciences is only at 34% in Europe and only 20% of people engaged in engineering are women. Although this number has increased since the early 1990s, women remain a minority in these environments, which stay very masculine.

How to explain this under-representation of women in STEM fields?
Contrary to the misconceptions pretending that this gap is due to the burden of family constraints, women's difficulties in building a professional network or even lower skills than men, the real causes are quite different. From childhood, in the school environment, little girls are confronted with an under-representation of women in most mathematics textbooks, among others, which hinders the process of identification with these trades. Moreover, the lack of a female role model in scientific careers only accentuates this difficulty of identification. There is also evidence that little girls, both at home and at school, experience positive discrimination, that is to say the practice of giving more attention to girls than boys because they are assumed to have fewer skills. As we grow older, this lack of interest in STEM only increases due to the weight of the stereotypes that shape our society. Who has never heard that women are good at literature and men at math? As Mrs Régner explained, tests have shown that the anchoring of these stereotypes in our memories is such that they lead to women's underperformance in these areas, which, ironically, only reinforces them. Finally, another discrimination, the wage gap, although declining, still remains at 17%. A "glass ceiling" that goes hand in hand with barriers to professional advancement to high responsibility positions.

Attracting young girls into STEM sectors: consequences and challenges
Beyond being a major societal issue, the consequences of this disparity are many. Dominique Lafontaine explains, for example, that most girls go into so-called socially useful professional sectors such as education, health or the human and social sciences, while boys opt for the exact sciences, engineering or information and communication technologies (ICT). The gendered disproportion in educational and career choices leads to a lack of diversity in STEM, which is felt even at the highest positions, where women are a tiny minority. Thus, decisions are still made by men, for men. Furthermore, women must take part in the digital revolution facing our society, otherwise they will struggle to find jobs, the majority of which will require skills in this area in the future.

How can we make a difference?
At the European level, Horizon 2020, the biggest EU Research and Innovation programme ever, will aim to better integrate women in research and innovation in order to improve the quality and relevance of scientific publications. To do so, the European Union works in collaboration with Member States, research organizations and the European Commission. As Mrs Pattono explained, since 2011 the European Union has awarded the European Prize for women innovators every year with the aim of promoting the place of active women in research and innovation.

At the Belgian level, Mrs Schyns highlighted the provisions relating to the multidisciplinary and polytechnical nature of the core curriculum provided for in the Pact of Excellence, which was created in 2015. Thus, girls and boys will receive a common and non-gendered training that is supposed to eliminate disparities. In Flanders, the Flemish STEM Action Plan 2012-2020, presented by Mrs Opdebeeck at the meeting, increased the number of secondary school students wishing to move towards STEM courses through the implementation of a ten-point programme to upgrade these courses.

Beyond the political sphere, there are many organizations working in the field to raise awareness among young girls to the development of their skills in STEM careers and to encourage vocations. Isabelle Deflandre, Director of the non-profit association "Elles bougent" and Simon Moreau, "Genre-et-TIC" Project Manager of the non-profit association “Interface3”, had the opportunity to present concrete actions implemented by their respective organizations, including information on the professions and the promotion of STEM sectors within the framework of fairs and events, or a system of sponsors allowing young girls to identify themselves with female role models who have succeeded in these sectors.

Our commitment
Fedactio has been working for many years in favour of gender equality, in particular through its "Women & Society" platform. Through our "Education" and "Entrepreneurs" platforms, we encourage young people to undertake studies and provide them with our logistical support and experience. It was therefore important for Fedactio to raise awareness among its audience of STEM issues and related problems by participating in this event. As a citizen movement, we also want to support existing initiatives or propose new ones in order to fight against stereotypes and gender discrimination. As to whether this will happen in the near or distant future, we are counting on your support.

[Woman in the spotlight] Nisreen Al-Hashemite and the International Day of Women and Girls in Science

On this International Day of Women and Girls in Science, we put Nisreen Al-Hashemite, a Iraqi princess who dedicated her life to science, in the spotlight. 

“We need to encourage girls and young women to pursue science and stay in science careers”, those are the words of Nisreen El-Hashemite, founder and president of Women in Science International League, and the Executive Director of the Royal Academy of Science International Trust (RASIT). The “Science Princess”, who is a member of the royal family of Iraq, holds a PhD in Human Genetics and a Medical Doctorate. When everyone told her that “science is not for royalty”, she persevered nevertheless. The International Day of Women and Girls in Science, which will take place on February 11, was created in 2015 when the General Assembly decided to recognize women and girls in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The idea was to focus on gender equality, to ensure that girls can benefit from an education and increase the possibility for women to work in the field of STEM. Nisreen El-Hashemite is indeed a great example, she advocates for gender equality in science, encourages young girls and women to pursue in this field. Her non-governmental organization RASIT is committed to sustaining future and to promoting excellence in education and science. Moreover, RASIT works with UN Women and other international organizations. RASIT launched a specific program dedicated to women and girls called “Science Princess, Global Campaign for Women and Girls in Science”. Science Princess celebrates the achievement of women who have forged the way for those of us in science today, to reach equality and parity in science. According to UNESCO data, less than 30% of researchers worldwide are women. This number is due to strong stereotypes that take women and girls away from science-related fields. Talking about girls and women in the field of science leads us to bridge the gender gap to achieve sustainable development such as improving health or combatting climate change. The main goal is to see more women becoming scientist and help make the world sustainable. Indeed, having more women or young girls in scientific fields and research could speed things up. As Princess Nisreen said “Science is the basis for many solutions to the world’s challenges. If women aren’t a part of science, technology, engineering or mathematics, they will be left out. Science and technology are the future and the future belongs to everyone”.

Female Genital Mutilation: A Belgian Reality?


In the context of the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation on February 6 of 2019, Fedactio looks at the issue of female genital mutilation, a too-often-ignored reality.


Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises all procedures that involve altering or injuring the female genitalia for non-medical reasons. Today, the United Nations estimate the number of women suffering from the consequences of these mutilations at around 200 million. Even if most of the countries concerned are generally located in Africa, Asia or the Middle East, Belgium is not spared. Indeed, according to the latest prevalence study carried out in 2016 by the FPS Public Health, more than 25,000 women and girls are reported to be concerned by female genital mutilation in Belgium. This study also highlighted that between 2007 and 2012, the number of women and girls who had undergone or were at risk of undergoing this type of mutilation doubled due to the arrival of women coming from countries including Indonesia, Guinea, Iraq and the countries of the Horn of Africa on the Belgian territory. These practises are generally motivated by socio-cultural factors. Typically, the most common reasons given by people perpetrating these acts of violence are social pressure, mutilation as a part of young girls’ education or cultural tradition. Of course, FGM has serious consequences, both for the physical and mental health of the women who have been cut.

This international day is part of several issues that have already been addressed by Fedactio in the past, such as violence against women and gender-based discrimination. As a Federation, Fedactio has been working for years on these various issues through its "Women and Society" platform. In fact, Fedactio advocates the emancipation of women as well as the recognition of their status as equal of men. These practices violate the rights of girls and women, but also of children, and therefore have no place in today's world.

In Belgium, several field associations, including the Group for the Abolition of FGM (GAMS Belgium), work on a daily basis to fight these practices. Fedactio had the opportunity to interview Fabienne Richard, Director of GAMS Belgium. The activities of this organization are structured around four main areas, namely:
- Prevention and awareness of families;
- Psycho-social support for women already excised;
- Training of professionals;
- And advocacy at the political level.
One of GAMS' most important achievements to date is the global action plan for victim support developed from 2016 onwards in collaboration with Fedasil and Intact. This project has made it possible to train at least two staff members present in each of the reception centres where women who have already been excised or are at risk of being excised arrive. Today, we need to focus on education and the inclusion of training that considers the issue of female genital mutilation in the school curricula of future midwives.

Although the subject remains a sore point, there is no doubt that things are changing. One of the most striking examples of this change is the 2018 Nobel prize-giving ceremony where Dr. Denis Mukwege and Nadia Murad won the 2018 Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts to end the use of sexual violence as a weapon of war. This February 6, the date of the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation, is therefore an opportunity for Fedactio to draw attention to the fight against this violence.

[Woman in the spotlight] Interview with Sophie Lucas, researcher and professor in cancer immunology



[Woman in the spotlight] In the context of World Cancer Day, Fedactio had the opportunity to speak with Sophie Lucas, researcher and professor in cancer immunology, about her daily life as a woman of science.
Interview by Alexandre Thiry
Could you tell us more about your background and motivations as a researcher?

My name is Sophie Lucas and I am a researcher in cancer immunology at the Duve Institute, which is a biomedical research institute hosting several laboratories of the faculty of medicine of UCL (Université Catholique de Louvain), where I am also professor. I studied medicine and then decided to devote myself to research. What motivates me is working in the biomedical branch to understand how organisms work, and especially the human being’s, but also how they dysfunction in the presence of very specific diseases such as cancer. As a team, we try to understand how the immune system can detect tumour cells and reject them in patients with cancer. Above all, we try to determine how to manipulate it to be able to correct these dysfunctions and develop new forms of cancer therapy.

What is immunology?

Immunology is a branch of biology that covers the study of immune system’s responses, the way our body defends itself against external aggressions, mainly of the microbial infection type (by viruses, parasites, bacteria…) but also against other forms of aggression which can come from within such as the development of cancer. We now know that our immune system is able to recognize tumour cells and reject them. This is the specific field of tumour immunology.

What does an immunologist’s daily life look like?

The daily life of an immunologist is very similar to that of any biomedical researcher, which means laboratory work and team meetings.  My job consists in managing a team of around ten people working in the laboratory on a joint research project. This team includes doctoral and post-doctoral students, as well as laboratory technicians. We handle reagents of different types, either cells that are grown in vitro or molecules whose modifications are examined following certain treatments, but also animal experiments. The closer we get to a potential clinical application, the more necessary it becomes to conduct animal experiments to test new forms of treatment that could eventually be applied to humans. My daily routine is to interact with all those people who are conducting cellular, molecular, or in vivo experiments, and to discuss with them the interpretation of the results, the direction of the project, hoping that from time to time an original idea will emerge and eventually lead to the development of a new drug.

As a woman, have you ever experienced any difficulties in your work?

Direct difficulties, specifically related to my gender, honestly not really, but I have experienced organizational difficulties. It is always difficult for a woman to find her place in a work environment, knowing that a lot of time and importance is given to her family life, to carry children when she wants them. All this has an impact on our working life. That said, I personally found answers to these questions, quickly realizing that my work was a very important thing and that I wanted to devote a lot of energy and passion to it. All this required some accommodation. In my case, I had the chance to have children with a person who left a lot of space for this passion. So, I would say that as a woman, and as a scientist, I have had more support than real disabilities in my career.


We often hear that science is mainly a male environment, is it true?
What do you think would be the cause of this imbalance?

Yes, it is true. I cannot even remember the number of meetings I attend, with people in higher hierarchical positions, where I am the only woman. Still today in 2019, the percentage of women in decision-making positions in the field of science is abnormally low. It would be very difficult for me to identify the root causes and origins of this disproportion, because I am not a sociologist, but I am somehow obliged to acknowledge the facts. Maybe women still have a bit of trouble giving their work the place it needs when they progress in their functions, in their careers? It is even more surprising since in the field of biomedical, pharmaceutical or medical sciences, there is a majority of young women students or doctoral candidates. In my laboratory too, women are in the majority. Beyond that, the proportion of women who persist (postdoctoral training) gradually decreases. We - women - must be very careful to ensure that we persist and progress in our careers without considering our gender as a disability. It must no longer be so today.

Isn't the fact that you have more female students in your field due to the "female" image that our society attributes to health care?

When we have chosen the path of basic research in the biomedical sciences, we are moving relatively far away from direct patient care. In my career, even though I am a physician by training, I have never had to interact with patients after my medical internships. My job is different, it is still a rigorous fundamental science, explicable at the molecular level. I do not know if it is the possibility of care, of therapy that justifies having more female students in biomedical programs. It remains an enigma to me.

What advice would you give to young people who wish to resume studies in this field?

At 50, when I look back, I have absolutely no regrets. I tell myself that I had the chance to have a great activity, so I would encourage these young people to get started. Now, do I have any specific advice for young women who want to go down this path? Maybe to think about them when they organize their family life. Because one day, when children grow up and leave, it is important to have something that motivates us incredibly. Research careers, in the field of biomedical sciences, but also in any scientific field as well as in the human sciences, can take you to the very long term. After the formation of a family, having raised children, and having brought them to independence, there is still a lifetime left. When you have the chance to do an exciting job, it is this whole life after that remains exciting.

What do you think about the place devoted to research in Belgium?

I think we have nothing to complain about because we are fortunate to live in a developed country where a significant proportion of GDP is devoted to basic academic research. I believe that the funding of basic research must be supported by the State if we want our societies to progress. If I am lucky enough to work in a country where research is relatively well funded, I think more support would benefit everyone.